SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Moto.wieszjak.pl - nowy wortal motoryzacyjny na rynku stawia na porady
Nowa witryna oferuje użytkownikom przegląd wiadomości z rynku motoryzacyjnego, testy aut nowych i używanych, liczne porady prawne i eksploatacyjne dla kierowców, moto-forum, niezbędnik oraz newsletter dla zmotoryzowanych.

 

188029584627_567160007151Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, sorry for my late answering - I was out for a few days. Since I do not have full insigight to neither the driver nor the internal connections of the board I need to guess. maybe the dri

 
157929004563_523760007015Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
142127824312_594860007475Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
190926504942_587460007469Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
114822864893_503560007461Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
166726224419_529460007440DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
144528724339_500860007723Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
102325304505_533660007674DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
181123864323_575260007111Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
122024084397_511360007139Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
157421104762_599360007054Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
143228504926_577260007034Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
149528824565_600060007042Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
167420284428_599760007688Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
110820014096_550560007540Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
164526884650_540660007054Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
146021134904_538660007762Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
142023804644_598660007862Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
102720534890_545560007670Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
114221584671_523860007786Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
177823084473_542860007154Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
148221734267_538560007153James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
114729814533_579160007913James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
165229934967_554260007016Udo van den Heuvel
On 10/23/06, James Olin Oden <james.oden at gmail.com wrote: I do believe we already have a patch where I work. Ill send it to the list in a moment. In need to hunt it down. If we dont hav

 
121225904174_588360007839Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1 for w83627hf to make my fans start again after booting the kernel on VIA Epia EK8000.

 
166926074146_514160007860Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:32:30 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1

 
129525174033_556360007593Roy Erickson
Jean Delvare wrote: If "sensors -s" is run as part of your init scripts, please remove it and check again, Id like to get it out of the list of suspects. $PSENSORS -s is in the lm_s

 
171620494574_524960007539Yongkui Han
Hello Roy, Please use the more decent subject. IM NOT SHOUTHING AT YOU too. Best would be to install the lmsensors package from your distribution. Become root. Run sensors-detect script which will d

 
116224924532_512860007980Message not availabl
Hi, I have an Intel D850MV motherboard. There is an ADM1025A sensor chip on the motherboard. Also there is an LPC47M142 I/O chip on the motherboard. My CPU is a Pentium 4 CPU, 1.7GHz. And her

 
114522464569_532060007398Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, Thanks very much for your help. Well always good to hear it. Unfortunately I have not so much free time recently for this kind of lm-sensors support stuff. The pin numbers for the

 
115827984004_530460007039Rudolf Marek
Hi Rudolf, I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU temp". It is about 20 seconds. In my opinion, the time constant of the silicon chip is about 10 millisecon

 
116422344556_519760007458Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Thank you for your reply. On 10/23/06, Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz wrote: Hi Yongkui I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU

 
179125144507_536460007347Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Forgot to include the attachment. Please check the attachment. Thank you! Yongkui On 10/25/06, Yongkui Han <hanyongkui99 at gmail.com wrote: Hi Rudolf, I drew the curve of

 
190429264840_543560007874Yongkui Han
I run the CPU burn benchmark for only 1 minute (plus 15 minutes system idle before running cpuburn, and 15 minutes system idle after cpuburn stops running), I even got the following message w

 
141421994119_598460007248Paul Aviles
Hello, I just installed a VIA Epia EK8000 board. It has w83697hf sensor chip, detected by sensors-detect. Temperature readings are high and do not move. Also changing set tempX Y to change diode, th

 
138126774046_538560007986Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:18:21 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: I have a weird question. The system I use are all the same, and one of them is really quiet and the others are somewhat louder in

 
142521444220_598160007017Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:31:55 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: Nice server.... [root at srv1 /]# sensors adt7463-i2c-0-2e Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 1480 ERROR: Cant get alarm mask da

 
143821334531_594660007294Rudolf Marek
Is this combination one of the ones thats not yet available? sensors-detect seems to work, but sensors says it cant find anything. Heres some output: [jhg at athena ~]$ lsmod|grep i2c i2c_i801

 
129324014219_513260007273Hans de Goede
Hello to the list. I have an HP Pavilion zv6069EA Laptop. Following your pages I succeeded in using i2c-piix4 with eeprom (but 1st question: what can I do now, since this is not a sensor?) and k8te

 
100622504472_512660007992Greg KH
Here are some hwmon fixes for 2.6.19-rc2. They have all been in the -mm tree for a while. Please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/hwmon-2.6.git/ or from: master.ker

 
137526154668_542160007649Greg KH
From: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Replace a bouncing email that I cannot recover from Mr Google. Signed-off-by: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <k

 
140624254794_562660007135Greg KH
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org The SMSC LPC47M112 Super-I/O chip appears to be compatible with the LPC47M10x and LPC47M13x as far as hardware monitoring is concerned. The device ID is

 
164428444268_517460007766Greg KH
From: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz Fix the detection of fan5 and preserve the bit between the register writes, because the bit is write only. Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at

 
146920824167_568960007003David Hubbard
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org Fix debug messages in w83781d at detection time. We cant use dev_dbg() on an i2c clients device before calling i2c_attach_client() on that client. Sign

 
196322214254_543560007488Christian Mahr
Hi David, On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:01:19 -0700, David Hubbard wrote: Im doing bits and pieces of the w83627dhg driver, and I want to make sure I test it on the latest patched w83627ehf driver. I be

 
142627224102_509460007102Hamlet
Hi Christian, You have a w83627dhg, if I remember correctly. The current driver you are probably using is the testing driver from the lm-sensors mailing list in September. Although it functions corr

 
174325494528_553660007933David Hubbard
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:55:10 -0300 Hamlet <hamletmun at fibertel.com.ar wrote: Winbond W83627DHG seems to be compatible with lm78 well, no not really.. the temp you get is MB temp, the cpu te

 
167128184777_594060007566David Hubbard
The patch will be for 2.6.19-rc2 or whichever kernel is the latest version. You should probably build a new kernel, as one of the things we would like to test is whether the patch compiles correctly

 
170624624648_587360007863Message not availabl
Hi Christian, Of yourse I can also test any newer version. I understand you want to make a separate driver for the W83627DHG for some 2.6.19-RC-xx? To be exact, the driver I sent you is for 2

 
187621134083_512960007431Christian Mahr
Hi Christian, Please include lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org in your reply so this will benefit others and get archived on the LM-sensors list. On 10/29/06, Christian Mahr <christian.mahr.ulm at ar