| title: | Re PATCH 1 1 mm unify pmd free implemen |
|
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:19:44 +0200
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
yep! clear.
Ok, in this case wouldnt be better at least to define pud_free() as:
static inline pud_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
{
}
I also like this :)
ok, a simpler patch using the inline function will follow.
I can second that. See
rel="nofollow" userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/include-asm-generic-pgtable-nopmdh-macros-are-noxious-reason-435.patch userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/include-asm-generic-pgtable-nopmdh-macros-are-noxious-reason-435.patch
Ingo cruelly ignored it. Probably hes used to ignoring the comit
storm which I send in his direction - Ill need to resend it sometime.
Id consider that patch to be partial - we should demacroize the
surrounding similar functions too. But that will require a bit more
testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at rel="nofollow" vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
