SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Nie podał hasła, trafił za kratki
W ten sposób brytyjski sąd chce zmusić nastolatka do podania hasła szyfrującego jego komputer. Sprawa jest poważna, dotyczy bowiem seksualnego wykorzystywania dzieci.

 

103724584364_533860007955Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, sorry for my late answering - I was out for a few days. Since I do not have full insigight to neither the driver nor the internal connections of the board I need to guess. maybe the dri

 
121528794555_508160007486Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
176625694389_582760007039Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
130524764858_595560007778Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
118324684773_523660007785Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
187624924242_524060007168DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
119420444047_575060007386Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
123528934955_562460007759DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
166420244235_552160007542Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
129821624009_507060007464Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
185522734956_509760007786Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
126627084830_531360007957Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
170026934849_565560007567Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
141329824592_564860007571Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
118928014733_519960007130Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
166327264404_561960007918Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
140420894626_523460007083Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
119021024777_503960007094Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
160721694075_519860007577Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
176920074377_550160007248Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
163128704975_503560007798Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
195428934887_557960007289James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
166323174392_543960007148James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
153329644318_560860007136Udo van den Heuvel
On 10/23/06, James Olin Oden <james.oden at gmail.com wrote: I do believe we already have a patch where I work. Ill send it to the list in a moment. In need to hunt it down. If we dont hav

 
118529304143_556360007350Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1 for w83627hf to make my fans start again after booting the kernel on VIA Epia EK8000.

 
181220614220_578660007709Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:32:30 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1

 
158420504602_547060007729Roy Erickson
Jean Delvare wrote: If "sensors -s" is run as part of your init scripts, please remove it and check again, Id like to get it out of the list of suspects. $PSENSORS -s is in the lm_s

 
176022924046_515160007403Yongkui Han
Hello Roy, Please use the more decent subject. IM NOT SHOUTHING AT YOU too. Best would be to install the lmsensors package from your distribution. Become root. Run sensors-detect script which will d

 
130022644366_561960007528Message not availabl
Hi, I have an Intel D850MV motherboard. There is an ADM1025A sensor chip on the motherboard. Also there is an LPC47M142 I/O chip on the motherboard. My CPU is a Pentium 4 CPU, 1.7GHz. And her

 
175520584458_589960007889Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, Thanks very much for your help. Well always good to hear it. Unfortunately I have not so much free time recently for this kind of lm-sensors support stuff. The pin numbers for the

 
124824334951_546960007047Rudolf Marek
Hi Rudolf, I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU temp". It is about 20 seconds. In my opinion, the time constant of the silicon chip is about 10 millisecon

 
117828034098_578060007728Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Thank you for your reply. On 10/23/06, Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz wrote: Hi Yongkui I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU

 
150820334020_555560007752Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Forgot to include the attachment. Please check the attachment. Thank you! Yongkui On 10/25/06, Yongkui Han <hanyongkui99 at gmail.com wrote: Hi Rudolf, I drew the curve of

 
195824864015_532460007889Yongkui Han
I run the CPU burn benchmark for only 1 minute (plus 15 minutes system idle before running cpuburn, and 15 minutes system idle after cpuburn stops running), I even got the following message w

 
185228604947_530960007568Paul Aviles
Hello, I just installed a VIA Epia EK8000 board. It has w83697hf sensor chip, detected by sensors-detect. Temperature readings are high and do not move. Also changing set tempX Y to change diode, th

 
119720064001_514760007221Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:18:21 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: I have a weird question. The system I use are all the same, and one of them is really quiet and the others are somewhat louder in

 
119526544023_529360007297Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:31:55 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: Nice server.... [root at srv1 /]# sensors adt7463-i2c-0-2e Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 1480 ERROR: Cant get alarm mask da

 
102129424331_504160007516Rudolf Marek
Is this combination one of the ones thats not yet available? sensors-detect seems to work, but sensors says it cant find anything. Heres some output: [jhg at athena ~]$ lsmod|grep i2c i2c_i801

 
179324534002_580860007106Hans de Goede
Hello to the list. I have an HP Pavilion zv6069EA Laptop. Following your pages I succeeded in using i2c-piix4 with eeprom (but 1st question: what can I do now, since this is not a sensor?) and k8te

 
169726294967_564360007724Greg KH
Here are some hwmon fixes for 2.6.19-rc2. They have all been in the -mm tree for a while. Please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/hwmon-2.6.git/ or from: master.ker

 
121121364731_521360007206Greg KH
From: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Replace a bouncing email that I cannot recover from Mr Google. Signed-off-by: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <k

 
143424794860_545760007293Greg KH
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org The SMSC LPC47M112 Super-I/O chip appears to be compatible with the LPC47M10x and LPC47M13x as far as hardware monitoring is concerned. The device ID is

 
175527934234_508660007730Greg KH
From: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz Fix the detection of fan5 and preserve the bit between the register writes, because the bit is write only. Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at

 
160326274182_560560007960David Hubbard
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org Fix debug messages in w83781d at detection time. We cant use dev_dbg() on an i2c clients device before calling i2c_attach_client() on that client. Sign

 
171221314589_567860007528Christian Mahr
Hi David, On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:01:19 -0700, David Hubbard wrote: Im doing bits and pieces of the w83627dhg driver, and I want to make sure I test it on the latest patched w83627ehf driver. I be

 
140229864664_513260007948Hamlet
Hi Christian, You have a w83627dhg, if I remember correctly. The current driver you are probably using is the testing driver from the lm-sensors mailing list in September. Although it functions corr

 
133926324427_519960007199David Hubbard
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:55:10 -0300 Hamlet <hamletmun at fibertel.com.ar wrote: Winbond W83627DHG seems to be compatible with lm78 well, no not really.. the temp you get is MB temp, the cpu te

 
149228454993_572660007827David Hubbard
The patch will be for 2.6.19-rc2 or whichever kernel is the latest version. You should probably build a new kernel, as one of the things we would like to test is whether the patch compiles correctly

 
145525344453_563860007888Message not availabl
Hi Christian, Of yourse I can also test any newer version. I understand you want to make a separate driver for the W83627DHG for some 2.6.19-RC-xx? To be exact, the driver I sent you is for 2

 
159828504018_518660007793Christian Mahr
Hi Christian, Please include lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org in your reply so this will benefit others and get archived on the LM-sensors list. On 10/29/06, Christian Mahr <christian.mahr.ulm at ar